Receiver Filter Drier selection questions
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 9:38 am
Receiver Filter Drier selection questions
Any reason not to use the biggest Receive/Filter/Drier available?
What are the thoughts on bigger vs smaller Receiver?
I have room to put the largest Receiver I found so far - Four Seasons 33345 with a canister that is 7ā tall and 4ā in diameter (88 cubic inches). For reference the OEM r12 system had one that was 7" tall and 2.5" in diameter (34 cubic inches).
What I see so far is:
- Pros
1) Iām thinking they make Receivers in different sizes for a reason. For my build I have the largest evaporator I could find at 32,000BTU so maybe the largest Receiver makes sense?
2) A bigger Receiver (likely) has more desiccant providing more moisture absorption/protection.
3) A bigger Receiver can hold more refrigerant allowing for more refrigerant reserve and allowing for full use of the whole surface of the condenser before the lower condenser section starts getting filled up with liquid.
4) A bigger Receiver would allow for more refrigerant reserve so the system would likely continue to work longer if there is a minor leak.
- Cons
A) It could take more refrigerant than minimally necessary to make a functional system.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this and if you happen to see some idea/concept my novice eye doesn't see, please mention it.
Andy
This project:
Make/Model: VW Vanagon applicable to years 1980-1991 with a Subaru EJ25 engine
AC system type: CUSTOM
Compressor - FS10
Condenser - 16x24 Parallel Flow Generic
Evaporator - 32,000BTU/610CFM
Hose - reduced barrier lengths (approx.) #6-25ft, #8-20ft, #10-8ft
Trinary Switch - SW psi triggers L 28open/29close H 454open/369close Fan 227on/185off
Refrigerant - r134A
Receiver/Drier - TBD
Any reason not to use the biggest Receive/Filter/Drier available?
What are the thoughts on bigger vs smaller Receiver?
I have room to put the largest Receiver I found so far - Four Seasons 33345 with a canister that is 7ā tall and 4ā in diameter (88 cubic inches). For reference the OEM r12 system had one that was 7" tall and 2.5" in diameter (34 cubic inches).
What I see so far is:
- Pros
1) Iām thinking they make Receivers in different sizes for a reason. For my build I have the largest evaporator I could find at 32,000BTU so maybe the largest Receiver makes sense?
2) A bigger Receiver (likely) has more desiccant providing more moisture absorption/protection.
3) A bigger Receiver can hold more refrigerant allowing for more refrigerant reserve and allowing for full use of the whole surface of the condenser before the lower condenser section starts getting filled up with liquid.
4) A bigger Receiver would allow for more refrigerant reserve so the system would likely continue to work longer if there is a minor leak.
- Cons
A) It could take more refrigerant than minimally necessary to make a functional system.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this and if you happen to see some idea/concept my novice eye doesn't see, please mention it.
Andy
This project:
Make/Model: VW Vanagon applicable to years 1980-1991 with a Subaru EJ25 engine
AC system type: CUSTOM
Compressor - FS10
Condenser - 16x24 Parallel Flow Generic
Evaporator - 32,000BTU/610CFM
Hose - reduced barrier lengths (approx.) #6-25ft, #8-20ft, #10-8ft
Trinary Switch - SW psi triggers L 28open/29close H 454open/369close Fan 227on/185off
Refrigerant - r134A
Receiver/Drier - TBD