Re: 1961 cadillac conversion
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 3:47 pm
Outside the box:
2xo is 75% correct that compressor swept volume displacement can solve your low refrigerant mass flow problem.
Suction gas flow restriction is the rest of the story. Relatively small suction hose I.D., bends and choke diameters inside fittings at the compressor should also be included in the capacity increase due to higher refrigerant mass flow per engine rev. Discharge and liquid hoses don"t matter.
A SD7H15 with a drive ratio of 1.5 for a 5500 rpm engine top end is a start for countermeasure.
I make stuff; and made a SD7H15 high performance compressor that exceeded the performance of a 10P20 0n a CAT using my KF head with a #14, !.25 thread suction fitting with over 5/8" ID bore entering the rear of the compressor straight in w/o bends. The compressor had other performance improvements. The suction hose was #14. Oil quanity was minimum with a TXV (less than factory safety factor.). The orifice tube kills performance because the oil quanity must be almost 75% more and the OT is a comprimise (ask any commercial AC guy). Use TXV w/o accumulator.
Mass flow and cooling is basically directly proportional the suction pressure at the intake valves.
hotrodac
2xo is 75% correct that compressor swept volume displacement can solve your low refrigerant mass flow problem.
Suction gas flow restriction is the rest of the story. Relatively small suction hose I.D., bends and choke diameters inside fittings at the compressor should also be included in the capacity increase due to higher refrigerant mass flow per engine rev. Discharge and liquid hoses don"t matter.
A SD7H15 with a drive ratio of 1.5 for a 5500 rpm engine top end is a start for countermeasure.
I make stuff; and made a SD7H15 high performance compressor that exceeded the performance of a 10P20 0n a CAT using my KF head with a #14, !.25 thread suction fitting with over 5/8" ID bore entering the rear of the compressor straight in w/o bends. The compressor had other performance improvements. The suction hose was #14. Oil quanity was minimum with a TXV (less than factory safety factor.). The orifice tube kills performance because the oil quanity must be almost 75% more and the OT is a comprimise (ask any commercial AC guy). Use TXV w/o accumulator.
Mass flow and cooling is basically directly proportional the suction pressure at the intake valves.
hotrodac