71403 wrote: Unless you dealt with R4's when they were common in daily drivers 15+ years ago you don't appreciate what a headache they were.
My only experience with R4 compressors was on my own '88 and '94 Suburbans, which were orifice tube in front and expansion valve in the rear. The 1988 was R-12, the 1994 factory R134a.
Yes, I had to replace the AC compressors in both, and I remember reading that these same R4 compressors lived a lot longer in similar GM trucks that were front-only AC, and the issues were related to the Suburban's dual AC. Even so, the R4 compressors lasted a several years at least, in Arizona and with daily use. So could work fine for poster's application.
bohica2xo wrote:There are probably only a half million Ford small blocks in junkyards with factory installed FS6 compressors with serpentine drives.
.
I have complete serpentine system from the Explorer and and Mustang (including the compressor) but does not fit the Falcon Engine Bay. The Falcon Engine Bay is actaully tigher than 1965 Mustang. Compressor hits the drivers side sock tower.
Waid
Go ahead & tell me how this one runs in to the shock tower - the dam valve cover is wider.
You seem very fixated on the R4.
FYI they used that mount as late as 1993, and I believe as early as 1980.
My car is not a Foxbody Mustang. It's 1964 Falcon. Engine bay's are not the same. See the picture below. I have about 1/4" clearance between nose of short Explorer Water Pump and Electric Radiator Fan. Foxbody Water Pump is even longer and there is no room and therefore Foxbody Serpentine system does not work. See the picture of the Explorer AC compressor and bracket. The AC hoses are right at the shock tower.
Am I fixated on the R4? Not really. That's why I have 5 different AC Compressors. I have R4, Explorer, Sanden, late model Chevy Sonic and Spark. The R4 does seems to fit in my case. The R4 Scroll from Global Parts Distributors, L.L.C. (GPD) is appealing to me since they have legitimate website and is available though RockAuto. They are based out of Macon, GA. Not sure sure about the eBay version.
Waid
Attachments
20170826_183223.jpg (126.11 KiB) Viewed 11352 times
20170826_183105.jpg (84.16 KiB) Viewed 11352 times
20170518_204342 (1).jpg (145.36 KiB) Viewed 11352 times
I'll gamble a V5 with top mount hose block - see '97 Caddy Catera or '05 Buick Century - or a Sanden 7176 would work in place of the Explorer compressor.
Ask GPD for a performance chart for their R4 scroll. Maybe you'll get a different answer than I did.
While they share lots of the stuff, the Falcon's Engine Bay is smaller than Mustangs. That's why drags link are not interchangeable because Mustangs engine bay is wider but the control arms are the same. The early 1962 Falcons are even tighter. The later Mustang's had even more room blue picture with AC compressor sitting on top. I would love to do that but can't. I might try to mount the alternator up high on drivers side and see if I can get any compressor to fit low on passenger side.
I forgot to mention that I am using a T5 transmission out of a SN95 (1994-1995) Mustang which is about 1" longer input shaft. This forced me to push my engine forward maximum as possible to clear the larger bell housing.
Here is my car. I am doing a complete restoration.
Waid
Attachments
wiring18.jpg (78.1 KiB) Viewed 11332 times
20170430_155739.jpg (128.36 KiB) Viewed 11334 times
20170430_155746.jpg (118.26 KiB) Viewed 11334 times